claim
---

Pepperl+Fuchs Blog

PXV versus PCV—What's the Difference?

Posted by Zach Steck on Tue, Jun 09, 2020

PXV_Title_Picture_Web

In early 2011, Pepperl+Fuchs released its first Data Matrix positioning system, the PCV absolute positioning read head. This 2-D camera system uses multi-redundant Data Matrix code tape to provide position data with submillimeter resolution. Along with position, it provides information on the Y-offset (movement up or down) and speed. Since its debut, the PCV has become a sought-after solution for accurate and reliable positioning in a variety of applications.

In 2017, Pepperl+Fuchs released the next generation of Data Matrix positioning—the PXV series. Based on the technology used in the PCV unit and combined with new hardware and concepts, the PXV comes along with performance improvements and new features.

How do they differ?

One significant difference is that the systems use different types of Data Matrix code tape. The PCV uses a smaller Data Matrix square (7 x 7 mm) and multiple rows to achieve redundancy. The PCV code tape is offered in one, two, or four-row configurations to increase tolerances or meet space constraints. This system only requires one readable Data Matrix square in the scanning window to determine absolute position. By increasing the number of squares in the field, redundancy also increases.

PCV_Tape

Image: Data Matrix code tape for PCV 

The PXV, on the other hand, uses a camera system capable of reading larger Data Matrix squares. It functions with a single row of 15 mm x 15 mm code squares, which can withstand comparatively more dirt and damage.

PXV_Tape

Image: Data Matrix code tape for PXV

In addition, PXV offers a much larger scanning window. The 120 mm x 80 mm window allows the PXV to recognize several of the bigger Data Matrix squares to accomplish similar redundancy if Data Matrix codes are damaged or blocked. Again, only one code is needed to establish position.

Other advantages of the PXV camera upgrade include:

  • Improved depth of focus
    • Depth of focus is the distance from the PXV to the code tape or Z-axis
    • The typical PXV unit is designed to be mounted 100 mm from the code tape but will allow for a tolerance up to +/- 50 mm (+/- 30 mm for high speed versions)
    • PCV offers tolerances up to +/- 40 mm with later versions (PCV…-6011)
  • Greater Y-tolerance
    • Y-axis tolerance is the movement up and down from the center of the code tape
    • PXV offers an improved Y tolerance of +/- 25 mm
    • PCV offers a tolerance of +/- 15 mm with the standard two-row code tape
  • Increased gap distance
    • Gap distance is the length the read head can traverse with no code tape present while providing absolute position data
    • PXV can function with a gap up to 75 mm with no loss of absolute position
    • PCV has a maximum gap distance of 20 mm

PXV_PCV6011_Window

 

Additional Highlights

Now that the two major differences between the PXV and PCV have been discussed—larger code squares and an upgraded camera (field of view)—there are several other highlights to point out when comparing the two devices:

  • Exact same dimensions, mounting, and connections
  • Both PXV and PCV have submillimeter resolution
    • PXV = 0.2 mm
    • PCV = 0.1 mm
  • Code tapes are available at lengths up to 100,000 meters
  • The standard PCV can reach speeds up to 12.5 m/s while PXV can travel up to 8 m/s with the standard versions
    • High-speed options are available for both series.
  • Both options feature event markers—specific pieces of code tape that supply a number to the control system that is used to operate a certain function in programming.
    • With the PCV, the event marker is placed on top of the positional code tape and the read head increments position when present—no absolute position is available when the read head is above the event marker.
    • The larger window of the PXV allows event markers to be placed next to the positional tape to provide absolute position and the event marker value simultaneously.

 

Three FAQs:

Is the PXV a drop-in alternative for the PCV?

No. As described earlier, the PXV read head uses a different style of code tape than the PCV system. If replacing PCV with PXV, the previously installed code tape must be swapped out with the larger Data Matrix square code tape.

Is PCV going obsolete?

There are currently no plans to discontinue the PCV system. Since the PCV has been sold for many years and a large number of devices are still in use, Pepperl+Fuchs will continue to offer and support PCV. Since the PXV is not a drop-in replacement, both read heads will be available moving forward.

PCV has been working perfectly fine for my application. Why should I switch to PXV?

In this scenario, we would recommend that you stick with what works for you. If you are satisfied with the PCV system, there is no need to switch over to PXV unless you want to take advantage of the upgrades and improvements described in this article. Pepperl+Fuchs is recommending PXV for all new installations, but upgrading pre-existing systems is up to the user.

 

More Information

Data Matrix Positioning Systems from Pepperl+Fuchs

PXV Data Matrix Positioning System

PCV Data Matrix Positioning System

safePXV Data Matrix Positioning System

Any additional questions or comments, please drop them below and we will respond!

Topics: Positioning Systems

Subscribe to Our Blog

Stay current on cutting-edge industrial automation technology and applications.

Subscribe to Our Blog

Subscribe

Recent Posts

Search our blog!

Loading Google Custom Search.....

Posts by Topic

see all

Follow Me